What is the best way to get Wi-Fi to a detached garage or another building?
Decide by distance. Within about 33 ft (50 ft at most), an outdoor mesh node or extender will usually do. Up to 328 ft (100 m) of cable, bury an Ethernet run and put an access point in the garage. Beyond that, or where you can't trench, use a point-to-point bridge, which needs clear line of sight.
Close in, a wireless mesh node is the easy answer, but the limit is shorter than most people expect. TP-Link tells owners of its outdoor Deco unit to keep it within 33 ft of the indoor unit it connects to wirelessly, and no more than 50 ft. A plain extender has a second problem: it rebroadcasts the same signal, so every frame crosses the air twice and throughput falls by at least half. If a garage is close but behind several walls, run a cable to the mesh unit instead. TP-Link removes the distance restriction once it has Ethernet backhaul.
Up to 100 m, cable is the most dependable option. Standards limit a twisted-pair Ethernet channel to 100 m (328 ft), made up of 90 m of fixed cable plus patch cords at each end, so a run from house to garage has to fit inside that. Buried cable needs to be direct-burial rated, with water-blocking gel or tape around the conductors. Ordinary outdoor-rated cable isn't recommended underground unless it's in conduit. At the far end, an access point turns the cable back into Wi-Fi. Copper between two buildings brings one risk that the air gap avoids: a ground-potential difference. One owner in this brief's evidence lost equipment at both ends to a single surge across 250 ft of Cat5e, so fit surge protection at both ends.
If you can't trench, or the building is past 100 m, a pair of radios replaces the cable. A pre-paired 5 GHz kit is enough to bring internet service to a garage. TP-Link rates its EAP211-Bridge kit to 1 km and markets these kits for buildings 100 to 3,000 ft away. Expect real throughput well under the 867 Mbps headline. From about 500 ft to a quarter mile, if you want the far building to behave like it is on the same gigabit switch, this guide's pick is two UISP Wave Picos: 60 GHz with a 5 GHz fallback.
Every bridge needs clear line of sight between the two mounting points, and 60 GHz needs it to be completely clear. A tree in the path or coated window glass will break the link. If a trench for power or water is going in anyway, this brief's field reports say to lay fiber in it too and skip the radios.
Confidence: multi-source · Based on 15 cited sources.
Products discussed
- UISP Wave Pico
Sources
- Best Option To Bridge 500ft. Distance · r/Ubiquiti
- Short range, high speed Point-to-Point solution · r/Ubiquiti
- Complete Novice Help — Wireless Wire · r/mikrotik
- Internet to multiple buildings · r/HomeNetworking
- UISP Wave Pico - Tech Specs · Ubiquiti
- CPE710 | 5GHz AC 867Mbps 23dBi Outdoor CPE · TP-Link
- Breaking the 100-Meter Barrier · Fluke Networks
- Going the Distance · Fluke Networks
- The Differences Between Outdoor-rated & Direct Burial Cables · Syston Cable Technology
- Direct Burial Ethernet Cable: Gel Filled vs. Waterproof Tape
Read the complete guide
The Quarter-Mile LinkBy Purchasd Research. Manufacturer specifications from techspecs.ui.com and mikrotik.com; 14 community threads across r/Ubiquiti, r/mikrotik and r/HomeNetworking read in full; 13 videos verified live against YouTube. Every price checked against at least one US dealer listing on 9 September 2026. No affiliation with any manufacturer or dealer. No affiliate links.